nmda receptor Search Results


95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc glun1
mRNA and protein levels of <t>GluN1</t> subunits of NMDARs in hippocampal cells. ( A ) Relative expression of Grin1 gene in the hippocampus of rats consumed different F - doses normalized to that of a pair of reference genes ( Eef1a+Ppia ). Average values ± SEM (n = 10). ( B , C ) Protein expression of native and phosphorylated (Ser890) forms of GluN1 subunit in cytosolic and membrane fractions, respectively. Shown are typical immunoblots and average values ± SEM (n = 8).
Glun1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/NMDA+Receptor+1+(GluN1)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc11546234-245-13-29
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glun1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies for glun2a
mRNA and protein levels of <t>GluN1</t> subunits of NMDARs in hippocampal cells. ( A ) Relative expression of Grin1 gene in the hippocampus of rats consumed different F - doses normalized to that of a pair of reference genes ( Eef1a+Ppia ). Average values ± SEM (n = 10). ( B , C ) Protein expression of native and phosphorylated (Ser890) forms of GluN1 subunit in cytosolic and membrane fractions, respectively. Shown are typical immunoblots and average values ± SEM (n = 8).
Antibodies For Glun2a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/NMDA+Receptor+2A+(GluN2A)+Antibody/10__1523_slash_JNEUROSCI__1414___21__2021_ascii32_-111-19-24
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies for glun2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc nr2b antibody
mRNA and protein levels of <t>GluN1</t> subunits of NMDARs in hippocampal cells. ( A ) Relative expression of Grin1 gene in the hippocampus of rats consumed different F - doses normalized to that of a pair of reference genes ( Eef1a+Ppia ). Average values ± SEM (n = 10). ( B , C ) Protein expression of native and phosphorylated (Ser890) forms of GluN1 subunit in cytosolic and membrane fractions, respectively. Shown are typical immunoblots and average values ± SEM (n = 8).
Nr2b Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/NMDA+Receptor+2B+(GluN2B)+Antibody/pmc04772825-84-9-13
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nr2b antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti rabbit glun2b
A . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from control (black), control+AP5 [50µM] (green), nIH (red) and nIH +AP5 [50µM] (blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in control, control+AP5, nIH and nIH+AP5. ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in control slices vs control+AP5 [50 µM]. B . ( top ) Representative image for GluN1. (bottom) The graph shows GluN1 did not change protein expression after nIH exposure compared with control. (two tailed t-test, t=0.63; df=4.1; P=0.55). C . (top) Western blot picture for GluN2A. (bottom) Comparison for both conditions show GluN2A decreased the protein content levels after nIH. (two tailed t-test, t=4.017; df=6.43; P=0.006). D . ( top ) Representative immunoblot image for <t>GluN2B.</t> (bottom) Comparison of both conditions show increased GluN2B levels after nIH (two tailed t-test, t=3.43; df=5.78; P=0.014). E . GluN2B/GluN2A comparison ratio. F . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP control +TCN [5 µM] (orange), control + ifenprodil [5 µM] (cyan) and control + both drugs (olive) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS and ( right ) Comparison of fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (one way ANOVA, F (3,20) =43.52; P<0.001). Black dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control slices from . G . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from nIH+TCN [5 µM] (dark yellow) and nIH +ifenprodil [5 µM] (light blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to slope before TBS ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (two tailed t-test, t=12.46; df=4.59; P=0.001). Red dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in nIH slices from . Scale bars for A, F and G: 10 msec x 0.2 mV. The box-plot parameters indicate mean ± S.E. The analysis was performed for A to E using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction and for F and G the analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001).
Anti Rabbit Glun2b, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/NMDA+Receptor+2B+(GluN2B)+Rabbit+mAb/bio_rxiv__2023__03__21__533692-69-26-29
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti rabbit glun2b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti glun2bpy1472
A . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from control (black), control+AP5 [50µM] (green), nIH (red) and nIH +AP5 [50µM] (blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in control, control+AP5, nIH and nIH+AP5. ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in control slices vs control+AP5 [50 µM]. B . ( top ) Representative image for GluN1. (bottom) The graph shows GluN1 did not change protein expression after nIH exposure compared with control. (two tailed t-test, t=0.63; df=4.1; P=0.55). C . (top) Western blot picture for GluN2A. (bottom) Comparison for both conditions show GluN2A decreased the protein content levels after nIH. (two tailed t-test, t=4.017; df=6.43; P=0.006). D . ( top ) Representative immunoblot image for <t>GluN2B.</t> (bottom) Comparison of both conditions show increased GluN2B levels after nIH (two tailed t-test, t=3.43; df=5.78; P=0.014). E . GluN2B/GluN2A comparison ratio. F . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP control +TCN [5 µM] (orange), control + ifenprodil [5 µM] (cyan) and control + both drugs (olive) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS and ( right ) Comparison of fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (one way ANOVA, F (3,20) =43.52; P<0.001). Black dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control slices from . G . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from nIH+TCN [5 µM] (dark yellow) and nIH +ifenprodil [5 µM] (light blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to slope before TBS ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (two tailed t-test, t=12.46; df=4.59; P=0.001). Red dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in nIH slices from . Scale bars for A, F and G: 10 msec x 0.2 mV. The box-plot parameters indicate mean ± S.E. The analysis was performed for A to E using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction and for F and G the analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001).
Anti Glun2bpy1472, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/Phospho-NMDA+Receptor+2B+(GluN2B)+(Tyr1472)+Antibody/pm38592586-50-15-18
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti glun2bpy1472 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc glun2b
Chronic moderate drinking differentially alters NMDA and GABAA receptors in the cortex and hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. a) Ethanol treatment did not alter cortical Grin2a expression in wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. b) Ethanol-treated APP/PS1 mice had higher cortical Grin2b expression compared to EtOH-treated wildtype mice. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype interaction ( p = 0.0319). c) H 2 O-treated APP/PS1 mice showed increased cortical Gabra5 expression compared to H 2 O-exposed wildtype mice (p < 0.05). This effect was lost in EtOH-exposed APP/PS1 Gabra5 mRNA levels. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype interaction ( p = 0.0249) and a trend in genotype effects ( p = 0.0723). d) Synaptic GluN2A levels was unaltered in the hippocampus of H 2 O- or EtOH-treated wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. e) Synaptic <t>GluN2B</t> levels was unaltered in the hippocampus of H 2 O- or EtOH-treated wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. f) Ethanol-treated wildtype mice showed increased synaptic GABA A R α5 subunit levels compared to H 2 O-treated wildtype mice. Ethanol treatment had no effect on GABAAR α5 subunit levels in APP/PS1 mice. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype effect ( p = 0.0347) and a trend in treatment effects ( p = 0.0644). Wildtype + H2O, n = 10; APP/PS1 + H2O, n = 9; Wildtype + EtOH, n = 7; APP/PS1 + EtOH, n = 8. * p < 0.05.
Glun2b, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/NMDA+Receptor+2B+(GluN2B)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc10010148-121-37-38
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glun2b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc pglun1 ser897
Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of NMDA receptors in the hippocampus of control and CsA-treated rats. (A) Representative images of the levels of total (pan) GluN2, GluN2A, GluN2B, p-GluN1 <t>(Ser897)</t> and total GluN1. (B-F) Respective quantifications of immunodetections normalized to β-actin and presented as a percentage of the control mean. Data represent the mean ± SEM. Statistics: ** *p ≤0.001 as determined by Student’s t-test; n = 6.
Pglun1 Ser897, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/Phospho-NMDA+Receptor+1+(GluN1)+(Ser897)+Antibody/10__1016_slash_j__jadr__2022__100394-83-55-60
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pglun1 ser897 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Synaptic Systems anti glun1
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Anti Glun1, supplied by Synaptic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/114+011/pmc06889826-196-26-27
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti glun1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Alomone Labs glun2b n terminus
( A ) Representative images of hippocampal synaptoneurosomes (prepared from adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6-8 weeks old) incubated with BDNF (50 ng/mL). Synaptoneurosomes were immunoassayed for <t>GluN2B</t> using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus and immunoassayed for vGlut1, PSD-95. Merge scale bar, 10 μm. Insert scale bar, 0.5 µm. Images illustrated in ( A ) were analyzed for the GluN2B integrated density ( B ) and GluN2B mean gray value ( C ). Data are the means ± SEM of 779 - 840 synaptoneurosomes per condition, in at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. ****p < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.
Glun2b N Terminus, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/Anti-NMDAR2B+(GluN2B)+(extracellular)+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2024__10__21__618702-60-28-32
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glun2b n terminus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Alomone Labs nr1
( A ) Representative images of hippocampal synaptoneurosomes (prepared from adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6-8 weeks old) incubated with BDNF (50 ng/mL). Synaptoneurosomes were immunoassayed for <t>GluN2B</t> using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus and immunoassayed for vGlut1, PSD-95. Merge scale bar, 10 μm. Insert scale bar, 0.5 µm. Images illustrated in ( A ) were analyzed for the GluN2B integrated density ( B ) and GluN2B mean gray value ( C ). Data are the means ± SEM of 779 - 840 synaptoneurosomes per condition, in at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. ****p < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.
Nr1, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/Anti-NMDAR1+(GluN1)+(extracellular)+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2020__06__03__130559-202-18-25
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nr1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Alomone Labs rabbit anti glun2d
List of antibodies used for immunohistochemistry
Rabbit Anti Glun2d, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/Anti-NMDAR2D+(GRIN2D)+(extracellular)+Antibody/pmc07849732-2-0-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti glun2d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Alomone Labs nr2a
Figure 1. Clinical features and immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding to conformational neuronal surface epitopes from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE). A. Clinical features of 35 patients with SLE, including 15 with active NPSLE at the time of sampling. 32/34 (94%) were on immunotherapies, including prednisolone (71%), hydroxychloroquine (41%), belimumab (6%) and rituximab (3%). ANA = anti-nuclear antibody. B. Live cell-based assays employing HEK293T cells with surface expressed N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) as <t>NR1-NR2A</t> or NR1-NR2B heteromers (nuclei highlighted with DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). First panel shows that a commercial antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the NR2A-subunit (red) binds to HEK293T cells which express NR1-NR2A heteromers. NMDAR-antibody encephalitis (NMDAR-Ab-E) patient serum IgGs (n=11) bind to the NR1-NR2A heteromers (second panel), and to NR1-NR2B heteromers / NR1 homomers (data not shown). NMDAR-antibody patient CSFs show similar binding (as Irani et al, 2010).10 Serum from healthy controls (n=36), plasma and CSFs from SLE patients (n=35 of each) show no binding. No binding was observed with the G11 antibody (data not shown, lower panel representative). Throughout, IgG binding was visualized with an anti-human 568-Alexaflour antibody (1:750 dilution, A-21090) C. Commercial antibodies against the extracellular domains of NR1 (Alomone, AGC-001), NR2A (Alomone,
Nr2a, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor/Anti-NMDAR2A+(GluN2A)+(extracellular)+Antibody/pm32951275-110-24-25
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nr2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


mRNA and protein levels of GluN1 subunits of NMDARs in hippocampal cells. ( A ) Relative expression of Grin1 gene in the hippocampus of rats consumed different F - doses normalized to that of a pair of reference genes ( Eef1a+Ppia ). Average values ± SEM (n = 10). ( B , C ) Protein expression of native and phosphorylated (Ser890) forms of GluN1 subunit in cytosolic and membrane fractions, respectively. Shown are typical immunoblots and average values ± SEM (n = 8).

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: AMPA and NMDA Receptors in Hippocampus of Rats with Fluoride-Induced Cognitive Decline

doi: 10.3390/ijms252111796

Figure Lengend Snippet: mRNA and protein levels of GluN1 subunits of NMDARs in hippocampal cells. ( A ) Relative expression of Grin1 gene in the hippocampus of rats consumed different F - doses normalized to that of a pair of reference genes ( Eef1a+Ppia ). Average values ± SEM (n = 10). ( B , C ) Protein expression of native and phosphorylated (Ser890) forms of GluN1 subunit in cytosolic and membrane fractions, respectively. Shown are typical immunoblots and average values ± SEM (n = 8).

Article Snippet: Rabbit antibodies to GluA1 (#13185), phospho-GluA1 (#8084), GluA2 (#5306), phospho-GluA2 (#3921), GluA3 (#4676), GluN1 (#5704), phospho-GluN1 (#3381), GluN2A (#4205), phospho-GluN2A (#4206), GluN2B (#4207) and phospho-GluN2B (#4208) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).

Techniques: Expressing, Membrane, Western Blot

A . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from control (black), control+AP5 [50µM] (green), nIH (red) and nIH +AP5 [50µM] (blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in control, control+AP5, nIH and nIH+AP5. ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in control slices vs control+AP5 [50 µM]. B . ( top ) Representative image for GluN1. (bottom) The graph shows GluN1 did not change protein expression after nIH exposure compared with control. (two tailed t-test, t=0.63; df=4.1; P=0.55). C . (top) Western blot picture for GluN2A. (bottom) Comparison for both conditions show GluN2A decreased the protein content levels after nIH. (two tailed t-test, t=4.017; df=6.43; P=0.006). D . ( top ) Representative immunoblot image for GluN2B. (bottom) Comparison of both conditions show increased GluN2B levels after nIH (two tailed t-test, t=3.43; df=5.78; P=0.014). E . GluN2B/GluN2A comparison ratio. F . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP control +TCN [5 µM] (orange), control + ifenprodil [5 µM] (cyan) and control + both drugs (olive) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS and ( right ) Comparison of fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (one way ANOVA, F (3,20) =43.52; P<0.001). Black dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control slices from . G . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from nIH+TCN [5 µM] (dark yellow) and nIH +ifenprodil [5 µM] (light blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to slope before TBS ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (two tailed t-test, t=12.46; df=4.59; P=0.001). Red dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in nIH slices from . Scale bars for A, F and G: 10 msec x 0.2 mV. The box-plot parameters indicate mean ± S.E. The analysis was performed for A to E using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction and for F and G the analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A Consequence of Immature Breathing induces Persistent Changes in Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Behavior: A Role of Pro-Oxidant State and NMDA Receptor Imbalance

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.21.533692

Figure Lengend Snippet: A . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from control (black), control+AP5 [50µM] (green), nIH (red) and nIH +AP5 [50µM] (blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in control, control+AP5, nIH and nIH+AP5. ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in control slices vs control+AP5 [50 µM]. B . ( top ) Representative image for GluN1. (bottom) The graph shows GluN1 did not change protein expression after nIH exposure compared with control. (two tailed t-test, t=0.63; df=4.1; P=0.55). C . (top) Western blot picture for GluN2A. (bottom) Comparison for both conditions show GluN2A decreased the protein content levels after nIH. (two tailed t-test, t=4.017; df=6.43; P=0.006). D . ( top ) Representative immunoblot image for GluN2B. (bottom) Comparison of both conditions show increased GluN2B levels after nIH (two tailed t-test, t=3.43; df=5.78; P=0.014). E . GluN2B/GluN2A comparison ratio. F . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP control +TCN [5 µM] (orange), control + ifenprodil [5 µM] (cyan) and control + both drugs (olive) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS and ( right ) Comparison of fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (one way ANOVA, F (3,20) =43.52; P<0.001). Black dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control slices from . G . ( left ) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from nIH+TCN [5 µM] (dark yellow) and nIH +ifenprodil [5 µM] (light blue) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( middle ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to slope before TBS ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS (two tailed t-test, t=12.46; df=4.59; P=0.001). Red dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in nIH slices from . Scale bars for A, F and G: 10 msec x 0.2 mV. The box-plot parameters indicate mean ± S.E. The analysis was performed for A to E using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction and for F and G the analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001).

Article Snippet: Membranes were incubated under constant shaking with primary antibodies: anti rabbit GluN1 (1:2000; Abcam Cat# ab109182, RRID:AB_10862307) anti-rabbit GluN2A (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4205, RRID:AB_2112295), anti-rabbit GluN2B (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 14544, RRID:AB_2798506), anti-rabbit NOX2 (1:2000; Abcam Cat# ab129068, RRID:AB_11144496) anti-rabbit NOX4 (1:500; Novus Cat# NB110-58851B, RRID:AB_1217375 and anti-mouse GAPDH (1: 10.000; Abcam Cat# ab8245, RRID:AB_2107448).

Techniques: Control, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Western Blot, Comparison

A . Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was measured in hippocampal homogenates from control, nIH Saline and 10-Mn. (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) =11.53; P=0.0016). B . (top) Representative blot of nuclear HIF1a performed from control, nIH Saline and IH 10-Mn mice. (bottom) Quantification of HIF1a expression (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) =5.76; P=0.017). C . (top) Immunoblot of NOX2. (bottom) Significant differences was found in hippocampal homogenate from nIH Saline compared to control and nIH Mn (one way ANOVA, F (2,15) =9.26; P=0.0024). D . (top) Representative image of NOX4. ( bottom ) Comparison of NOX4 expression between control, nIH Saline and nIH Mn . (one way ANOVA, F (2,9) =11.46; P=0.0034). E . ( left ) Representative blot of GluN2A from control, nIH Saline and nIH Mn mice. ( right ). Quantification of GluN2A expression. (one way ANOVA, F (2,15) =6.63; P=0.0086). F . ( left ) Immunoblot of GluN2B. ( right ) Significant differences were found in hippocampal homogenate from nIH Saline vs control and nIH Mn . (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) =6.88; P=0.01). G . (top) Representative traces of evoked fEPSP from nIH Mn (purple) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in nIH Mn . ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in nIH vs nIH Mn slices. (two tailed t-test, t=3.41; df=10.61; P=0.0061). Dashed lines represent the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control (black dashed line) and nIH (red dashed line) slices from . H . (top) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from nIH Mn in presence the ifenprodil [5 µM] (light purple) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in nIH Mn in presence the ifenprodil. ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in IH+ifenprodil vs nIH Mn in presence of ifenprodil. (two tailed t-test, t=3.99; df=6.99; P=0.019). Blue dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in ifenprodil treated nIH slices from . For G and H, Scale bars 10 msec x 0.2 mV. The analysis was performed for A to F using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc and for G and F, the analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A Consequence of Immature Breathing induces Persistent Changes in Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Behavior: A Role of Pro-Oxidant State and NMDA Receptor Imbalance

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.21.533692

Figure Lengend Snippet: A . Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was measured in hippocampal homogenates from control, nIH Saline and 10-Mn. (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) =11.53; P=0.0016). B . (top) Representative blot of nuclear HIF1a performed from control, nIH Saline and IH 10-Mn mice. (bottom) Quantification of HIF1a expression (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) =5.76; P=0.017). C . (top) Immunoblot of NOX2. (bottom) Significant differences was found in hippocampal homogenate from nIH Saline compared to control and nIH Mn (one way ANOVA, F (2,15) =9.26; P=0.0024). D . (top) Representative image of NOX4. ( bottom ) Comparison of NOX4 expression between control, nIH Saline and nIH Mn . (one way ANOVA, F (2,9) =11.46; P=0.0034). E . ( left ) Representative blot of GluN2A from control, nIH Saline and nIH Mn mice. ( right ). Quantification of GluN2A expression. (one way ANOVA, F (2,15) =6.63; P=0.0086). F . ( left ) Immunoblot of GluN2B. ( right ) Significant differences were found in hippocampal homogenate from nIH Saline vs control and nIH Mn . (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) =6.88; P=0.01). G . (top) Representative traces of evoked fEPSP from nIH Mn (purple) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in nIH Mn . ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in nIH vs nIH Mn slices. (two tailed t-test, t=3.41; df=10.61; P=0.0061). Dashed lines represent the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control (black dashed line) and nIH (red dashed line) slices from . H . (top) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from nIH Mn in presence the ifenprodil [5 µM] (light purple) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to the slope before TBS in nIH Mn in presence the ifenprodil. ( right ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS in IH+ifenprodil vs nIH Mn in presence of ifenprodil. (two tailed t-test, t=3.99; df=6.99; P=0.019). Blue dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in ifenprodil treated nIH slices from . For G and H, Scale bars 10 msec x 0.2 mV. The analysis was performed for A to F using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc and for G and F, the analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001.

Article Snippet: Membranes were incubated under constant shaking with primary antibodies: anti rabbit GluN1 (1:2000; Abcam Cat# ab109182, RRID:AB_10862307) anti-rabbit GluN2A (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4205, RRID:AB_2112295), anti-rabbit GluN2B (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 14544, RRID:AB_2798506), anti-rabbit NOX2 (1:2000; Abcam Cat# ab129068, RRID:AB_11144496) anti-rabbit NOX4 (1:500; Novus Cat# NB110-58851B, RRID:AB_1217375 and anti-mouse GAPDH (1: 10.000; Abcam Cat# ab8245, RRID:AB_2107448).

Techniques: Control, Saline, Expressing, Western Blot, Comparison, Two Tailed Test

A . (top) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from adult control (black) and adult mice were exposed to neonatal IH (red) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to baseline prior to TBS. ( right bottom ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min following TBS in adult control vs Adult nIH (two tailed t-test, t=5.70; df=9.04; P=0.003). B . (top) Representative trace of the evoked from control+ TCN-213 [5 µM] and control + ifenprodil [5 µM] in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to baseline prior to TBS. ( right bottom ) fEPSP comparison at 60 min following TBS in control +TCN and control+ ifenprodil (two tailed t-test, t=7.43; df=4.65; P=0.0009). Black dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control slices from . C . (top) Representative trace of the evoked response from Adult nIH + TCN-213 [5 µM] and Adult nIH + ifenprodil [5 µM] in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to baseline prior to TBS. ( right bottom ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min following TBS (two tailed t-test, t=4.72; df=4.06; P=0.0064). Red dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP after 60 min following TBS in control slices from . D . (top) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from adult mice was exposure to neonatal IH+10 days of MnTMPyP (Adult nIH-Mn ) and adult mice receive MnTMPyP after exposure to neonatal IH (Adult REC-Mn ) in baseline conditions before TBS (1) and after TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to slope before TBS in Adult nIH-Mn vs Adult REC-Mn ( right bottom ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS Adult nIH-Mn vs Adult REC-Mn (two tailed t-test, t=3.79; df=8.16; P=0.0051). E. Representative image of GluN1. ( bottom ) Quantification shows GluN1 protein expression is not changed in Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or 10+Mn exposures compared to control (one way ANOVA, F (3,16)=1.14 ; P=0.93; N=5). F . (top) Representative blot of GluN2A performed from adult mice unexposed, Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or Adult REC-Mn . ( bottom ). Quantification of GluN2A expression from adult control, Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or 10+Mn. (one way ANOVA, F (3,12)=8.31 ; P=0.0029, N=4). G . (top) Immunoblot of GluN2B. ( bottom ) Significant differences were found in hippocampal homogenates from adult control, Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or Adult REC-Mn (one way ANOVA, F (3,12)=4.91 ; P=0.018, N=4). The box plot parameters indicate mean ± S.E. The analysis was performed for A-D using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. The analysis was performed for E-G using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. *P=0.05, **P=0.01, ***P=0.001 and N.S= no significant. Scale bars for A,B, F and G= 10 msec x 0.2 mV

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A Consequence of Immature Breathing induces Persistent Changes in Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Behavior: A Role of Pro-Oxidant State and NMDA Receptor Imbalance

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.21.533692

Figure Lengend Snippet: A . (top) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from adult control (black) and adult mice were exposed to neonatal IH (red) in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to baseline prior to TBS. ( right bottom ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min following TBS in adult control vs Adult nIH (two tailed t-test, t=5.70; df=9.04; P=0.003). B . (top) Representative trace of the evoked from control+ TCN-213 [5 µM] and control + ifenprodil [5 µM] in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to baseline prior to TBS. ( right bottom ) fEPSP comparison at 60 min following TBS in control +TCN and control+ ifenprodil (two tailed t-test, t=7.43; df=4.65; P=0.0009). Black dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP 60 min following TBS in control slices from . C . (top) Representative trace of the evoked response from Adult nIH + TCN-213 [5 µM] and Adult nIH + ifenprodil [5 µM] in baseline conditions prior to TBS (1) and following TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time relative to baseline prior to TBS. ( right bottom ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min following TBS (two tailed t-test, t=4.72; df=4.06; P=0.0064). Red dashed line represents the mean slope of the fEPSP after 60 min following TBS in control slices from . D . (top) Representative traces of the evoked fEPSP from adult mice was exposure to neonatal IH+10 days of MnTMPyP (Adult nIH-Mn ) and adult mice receive MnTMPyP after exposure to neonatal IH (Adult REC-Mn ) in baseline conditions before TBS (1) and after TBS (2). ( left bottom ) Mean fEPSP slope plotted as a function of time and relative to slope before TBS in Adult nIH-Mn vs Adult REC-Mn ( right bottom ) fEPSP slope represented as percent change from baseline at 60 min after TBS Adult nIH-Mn vs Adult REC-Mn (two tailed t-test, t=3.79; df=8.16; P=0.0051). E. Representative image of GluN1. ( bottom ) Quantification shows GluN1 protein expression is not changed in Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or 10+Mn exposures compared to control (one way ANOVA, F (3,16)=1.14 ; P=0.93; N=5). F . (top) Representative blot of GluN2A performed from adult mice unexposed, Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or Adult REC-Mn . ( bottom ). Quantification of GluN2A expression from adult control, Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or 10+Mn. (one way ANOVA, F (3,12)=8.31 ; P=0.0029, N=4). G . (top) Immunoblot of GluN2B. ( bottom ) Significant differences were found in hippocampal homogenates from adult control, Adult nIH , Adult nIH-Mn or Adult REC-Mn (one way ANOVA, F (3,12)=4.91 ; P=0.018, N=4). The box plot parameters indicate mean ± S.E. The analysis was performed for A-D using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. The analysis was performed for E-G using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. *P=0.05, **P=0.01, ***P=0.001 and N.S= no significant. Scale bars for A,B, F and G= 10 msec x 0.2 mV

Article Snippet: Membranes were incubated under constant shaking with primary antibodies: anti rabbit GluN1 (1:2000; Abcam Cat# ab109182, RRID:AB_10862307) anti-rabbit GluN2A (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4205, RRID:AB_2112295), anti-rabbit GluN2B (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 14544, RRID:AB_2798506), anti-rabbit NOX2 (1:2000; Abcam Cat# ab129068, RRID:AB_11144496) anti-rabbit NOX4 (1:500; Novus Cat# NB110-58851B, RRID:AB_1217375 and anti-mouse GAPDH (1: 10.000; Abcam Cat# ab8245, RRID:AB_2107448).

Techniques: Control, Two Tailed Test, Comparison, Expressing, Western Blot

Chronic moderate drinking differentially alters NMDA and GABAA receptors in the cortex and hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. a) Ethanol treatment did not alter cortical Grin2a expression in wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. b) Ethanol-treated APP/PS1 mice had higher cortical Grin2b expression compared to EtOH-treated wildtype mice. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype interaction ( p = 0.0319). c) H 2 O-treated APP/PS1 mice showed increased cortical Gabra5 expression compared to H 2 O-exposed wildtype mice (p < 0.05). This effect was lost in EtOH-exposed APP/PS1 Gabra5 mRNA levels. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype interaction ( p = 0.0249) and a trend in genotype effects ( p = 0.0723). d) Synaptic GluN2A levels was unaltered in the hippocampus of H 2 O- or EtOH-treated wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. e) Synaptic GluN2B levels was unaltered in the hippocampus of H 2 O- or EtOH-treated wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. f) Ethanol-treated wildtype mice showed increased synaptic GABA A R α5 subunit levels compared to H 2 O-treated wildtype mice. Ethanol treatment had no effect on GABAAR α5 subunit levels in APP/PS1 mice. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype effect ( p = 0.0347) and a trend in treatment effects ( p = 0.0644). Wildtype + H2O, n = 10; APP/PS1 + H2O, n = 9; Wildtype + EtOH, n = 7; APP/PS1 + EtOH, n = 8. * p < 0.05.

Journal: Neurobiology of disease

Article Title: Ethanol exposure alters Alzheimer’s-related pathology, behavior, and metabolism in APP/PS1 mice

doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105967

Figure Lengend Snippet: Chronic moderate drinking differentially alters NMDA and GABAA receptors in the cortex and hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. a) Ethanol treatment did not alter cortical Grin2a expression in wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. b) Ethanol-treated APP/PS1 mice had higher cortical Grin2b expression compared to EtOH-treated wildtype mice. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype interaction ( p = 0.0319). c) H 2 O-treated APP/PS1 mice showed increased cortical Gabra5 expression compared to H 2 O-exposed wildtype mice (p < 0.05). This effect was lost in EtOH-exposed APP/PS1 Gabra5 mRNA levels. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype interaction ( p = 0.0249) and a trend in genotype effects ( p = 0.0723). d) Synaptic GluN2A levels was unaltered in the hippocampus of H 2 O- or EtOH-treated wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. e) Synaptic GluN2B levels was unaltered in the hippocampus of H 2 O- or EtOH-treated wildtype or APP/PS1 mice. f) Ethanol-treated wildtype mice showed increased synaptic GABA A R α5 subunit levels compared to H 2 O-treated wildtype mice. Ethanol treatment had no effect on GABAAR α5 subunit levels in APP/PS1 mice. 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × genotype effect ( p = 0.0347) and a trend in treatment effects ( p = 0.0644). Wildtype + H2O, n = 10; APP/PS1 + H2O, n = 9; Wildtype + EtOH, n = 7; APP/PS1 + EtOH, n = 8. * p < 0.05.

Article Snippet: The following primary and secondary antibodies were used for this study: APP (including CTFβ and CTFα; Invitrogen; CT695; 1:1000), BACE1 (Cell Signaling; 5606S; 1:1000), ADAM10 (Millipore; AB19026; 1:1000), IDE (Abcam; ab232216; 1:1000), GluN2A (Cell Signaling; 4025; 1:1000), GluN2B (Cell Signaling; 4212; 1:1000), GABAAR α5 (Santa Cruz; Sc393921; 1:1000), and β-actin (Millipore; MAB1501; 1:50,000), anti-mouse (Cell Signaling; 7076S; 1:5000), anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling; 7074S; 1:5000).

Techniques: Expressing

Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of NMDA receptors in the hippocampus of control and CsA-treated rats. (A) Representative images of the levels of total (pan) GluN2, GluN2A, GluN2B, p-GluN1 (Ser897) and total GluN1. (B-F) Respective quantifications of immunodetections normalized to β-actin and presented as a percentage of the control mean. Data represent the mean ± SEM. Statistics: ** *p ≤0.001 as determined by Student’s t-test; n = 6.

Journal: Journal of Affective Disorders Reports

Article Title: Long-term cyclosporine A treatment promotes anxiety-like behavior: Possible relation with glutamate signaling in rat hippocampus

doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100394

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of NMDA receptors in the hippocampus of control and CsA-treated rats. (A) Representative images of the levels of total (pan) GluN2, GluN2A, GluN2B, p-GluN1 (Ser897) and total GluN1. (B-F) Respective quantifications of immunodetections normalized to β-actin and presented as a percentage of the control mean. Data represent the mean ± SEM. Statistics: ** *p ≤0.001 as determined by Student’s t-test; n = 6.

Article Snippet: The utilized primary antibodies and respective dilutions were as follows: anti-AMPAR (1:500, #13185 Cell Signaling Technology), phosphorylated AMPAR (pAMPAR-S831) (1:1000, A4352-Sigma–Aldrich), pAMPAR (S845) (1:1000, #8084 – Cell Signaling Technology), GluN1 (1:750, #G8913 – Sigma–Aldrich), pan-GluN2 (1:750, 244-0P – SYSY Synaptic Systems), GluN2A (1:1000, #4205 - Cell Signaling Technology), GluN2B (1:1000, #4207 - Cell Signaling Technology), pGluN1 (Ser897) (1:500, 3385S – Cell Signaling Technology), nNOS (1:500, SC648 – Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and iNOS (1:750, SC7271 – Santa Cruz Biotechnology). β-actin antibody (1:5000, A5441 – Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a loading control in the experiments.

Techniques: Western Blot, Control

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Abnormal Striatal Development Underlies the Early Onset of Behavioral Deficits in Shank3B −/− Mice

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.021

Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Article Snippet: Antibodies used in this study include anti-DCX (Santa Cruz sc-271390), anti-SV2A (SySy 119002), anti-AKAP12 (Abcam ab49849), anti-Prkacb (Sigma-Aldrich sab2104516), anti GAPDH (CST 2118S), anti-Synaptotagmin (SySy 105011), anti-GluN1 (SySy 114011), anti-VDAC (CST 4661S), anti-Calreticulin (CST 12238S).

Techniques: Virus, Plasmid Preparation, Mass Spectrometry

( A ) Representative images of hippocampal synaptoneurosomes (prepared from adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6-8 weeks old) incubated with BDNF (50 ng/mL). Synaptoneurosomes were immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus and immunoassayed for vGlut1, PSD-95. Merge scale bar, 10 μm. Insert scale bar, 0.5 µm. Images illustrated in ( A ) were analyzed for the GluN2B integrated density ( B ) and GluN2B mean gray value ( C ). Data are the means ± SEM of 779 - 840 synaptoneurosomes per condition, in at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. ****p < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors mediates the effects of BDNF-TrkB signalling on synaptic plasticity and in epileptogenesis

doi: 10.1101/2024.10.21.618702

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative images of hippocampal synaptoneurosomes (prepared from adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6-8 weeks old) incubated with BDNF (50 ng/mL). Synaptoneurosomes were immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus and immunoassayed for vGlut1, PSD-95. Merge scale bar, 10 μm. Insert scale bar, 0.5 µm. Images illustrated in ( A ) were analyzed for the GluN2B integrated density ( B ) and GluN2B mean gray value ( C ). Data are the means ± SEM of 779 - 840 synaptoneurosomes per condition, in at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. ****p < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

Article Snippet: To label surface GluN2B-containing NMDAR, live neurons (low-density hippocampal cultures) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature (RT) with an antibody against an extracellular epitope of the GluN2B N-terminus (1:100; AGC-003, Alomone Labs) diluted in a saline buffer (145 mM NaCl, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MgCl 2, [pH 7.3]) (Sham) solution, as previously described ( ).

Techniques: Incubation, Immunofluorescence

( A ) Representative images of hippocampal neurons (DIV 14 - 15) that were stimulated with BDNF (50 ng/ml for 10 or 30 min), as indicated. Neurons were then live-immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus, fixed, and then further immunoassayed for PSD-95, vGlut1, and MAP2. Scale bar, 5 μm. Images illustrated in ( A) , were analyzed for the total number ( B ), intensity ( C ), and area ( D ) of surface GluN2B puncta per µm. Synaptic (PSD-95- and vGlut1-colocalized) surface GluN2B number ( E ), area ( F ), and intensity ( G ) of puncta per density of excitatory synapses (number of puncta PSD-95–vGlut1 colocalized per µm), were also analyzed. Data are normalized to the means of the control and are the means ± SEM of 43-45 cells per condition, from at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors mediates the effects of BDNF-TrkB signalling on synaptic plasticity and in epileptogenesis

doi: 10.1101/2024.10.21.618702

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative images of hippocampal neurons (DIV 14 - 15) that were stimulated with BDNF (50 ng/ml for 10 or 30 min), as indicated. Neurons were then live-immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus, fixed, and then further immunoassayed for PSD-95, vGlut1, and MAP2. Scale bar, 5 μm. Images illustrated in ( A) , were analyzed for the total number ( B ), intensity ( C ), and area ( D ) of surface GluN2B puncta per µm. Synaptic (PSD-95- and vGlut1-colocalized) surface GluN2B number ( E ), area ( F ), and intensity ( G ) of puncta per density of excitatory synapses (number of puncta PSD-95–vGlut1 colocalized per µm), were also analyzed. Data are normalized to the means of the control and are the means ± SEM of 43-45 cells per condition, from at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-test.

Article Snippet: To label surface GluN2B-containing NMDAR, live neurons (low-density hippocampal cultures) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature (RT) with an antibody against an extracellular epitope of the GluN2B N-terminus (1:100; AGC-003, Alomone Labs) diluted in a saline buffer (145 mM NaCl, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MgCl 2, [pH 7.3]) (Sham) solution, as previously described ( ).

Techniques: Control, Analysis, Immunofluorescence

( A ) Representative images of hippocampal neurons (DIV 14 - 15) pre-incubated with GÖ 6983 (100 nM) or vehicle (DMSO; 1:1000 dilution for 40 min) and then either maintained under the same conditions or stimulated with BDNF (50 ng/ml for 30 min), as indicated. Neurons were live-immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus, fixed, and then further immunoassayed for PSD-95, vGlut1, and MAP2. Scale bar, 5 μm. Images illustrated in ( A ) were analyzed for the total number ( B ), area ( C ), and intensity ( D ) of surface GluN2B puncta per µm. Synaptic (PSD-95- and vGlut1-colocalized) surface GluN2B number ( E ), area ( F ), and intensity ( G ) of puncta per µm of excitatory synapses (number of puncta PSD-95–vGlut1 colocalized per µm), were also analyzed. Data are normalized to the mean of the DMSO control and are the means ± SEM of 28 - 30 cells per condition, in at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors mediates the effects of BDNF-TrkB signalling on synaptic plasticity and in epileptogenesis

doi: 10.1101/2024.10.21.618702

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative images of hippocampal neurons (DIV 14 - 15) pre-incubated with GÖ 6983 (100 nM) or vehicle (DMSO; 1:1000 dilution for 40 min) and then either maintained under the same conditions or stimulated with BDNF (50 ng/ml for 30 min), as indicated. Neurons were live-immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus, fixed, and then further immunoassayed for PSD-95, vGlut1, and MAP2. Scale bar, 5 μm. Images illustrated in ( A ) were analyzed for the total number ( B ), area ( C ), and intensity ( D ) of surface GluN2B puncta per µm. Synaptic (PSD-95- and vGlut1-colocalized) surface GluN2B number ( E ), area ( F ), and intensity ( G ) of puncta per µm of excitatory synapses (number of puncta PSD-95–vGlut1 colocalized per µm), were also analyzed. Data are normalized to the mean of the DMSO control and are the means ± SEM of 28 - 30 cells per condition, in at least three independent experiments performed in different preparations. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-test.

Article Snippet: To label surface GluN2B-containing NMDAR, live neurons (low-density hippocampal cultures) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature (RT) with an antibody against an extracellular epitope of the GluN2B N-terminus (1:100; AGC-003, Alomone Labs) diluted in a saline buffer (145 mM NaCl, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MgCl 2, [pH 7.3]) (Sham) solution, as previously described ( ).

Techniques: Incubation, Control, Analysis, Immunofluorescence

( A ) Experimental design for the lithium-pilocarpine model of Status Epilepticus. ( B ) Representative images of hippocampal synaptoneurosomes (prepared from adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6-8 weeks old, treated with saline, saline and ANA-12, Pilocarpine or Pilocarpine and ANA-12). Synaptoneurosomes were live-immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus and immunoassayed for vGlut1 and PSD-95. Merge scale bar, 10 μm. Insert scale bar, 0.5 µm. Images illustrated in ( B ) were analyzed for the GluN2B integrated density ( C ) and GluN2B mean gray value ( D ). Data are the means ± SEM of 779 - 840 synaptoneurosomes per condition, from at least four animals for each experimental condition. ****p < 0.0001, **p<0.01 as determined by Kruskal Wallis’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Representative western blot and analysis ( E-G ). Proteins were extracted from synaptoneurosomes prepared from the same animals used in the immunocytochemistry experiments. For the immunoblot, antibodies against pTrkB, total TrKB and β-Tubulin were used. In this analysis, pTrkB levels were normalized to total TrkB levels and total TrkB levels were normalized to β-tubulin. Data are means ± SEM of at least four animals for each experimental condition. *p < 0.05, by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors mediates the effects of BDNF-TrkB signalling on synaptic plasticity and in epileptogenesis

doi: 10.1101/2024.10.21.618702

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental design for the lithium-pilocarpine model of Status Epilepticus. ( B ) Representative images of hippocampal synaptoneurosomes (prepared from adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6-8 weeks old, treated with saline, saline and ANA-12, Pilocarpine or Pilocarpine and ANA-12). Synaptoneurosomes were live-immunoassayed for GluN2B using an antibody against an extracellular epitope in the GluN2B N-terminus and immunoassayed for vGlut1 and PSD-95. Merge scale bar, 10 μm. Insert scale bar, 0.5 µm. Images illustrated in ( B ) were analyzed for the GluN2B integrated density ( C ) and GluN2B mean gray value ( D ). Data are the means ± SEM of 779 - 840 synaptoneurosomes per condition, from at least four animals for each experimental condition. ****p < 0.0001, **p<0.01 as determined by Kruskal Wallis’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Representative western blot and analysis ( E-G ). Proteins were extracted from synaptoneurosomes prepared from the same animals used in the immunocytochemistry experiments. For the immunoblot, antibodies against pTrkB, total TrKB and β-Tubulin were used. In this analysis, pTrkB levels were normalized to total TrkB levels and total TrkB levels were normalized to β-tubulin. Data are means ± SEM of at least four animals for each experimental condition. *p < 0.05, by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post-test.

Article Snippet: To label surface GluN2B-containing NMDAR, live neurons (low-density hippocampal cultures) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature (RT) with an antibody against an extracellular epitope of the GluN2B N-terminus (1:100; AGC-003, Alomone Labs) diluted in a saline buffer (145 mM NaCl, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MgCl 2, [pH 7.3]) (Sham) solution, as previously described ( ).

Techniques: Saline, Western Blot, Analysis, Immunocytochemistry, Immunofluorescence

List of antibodies used for immunohistochemistry

Journal: Channels

Article Title: Differential expression of GluN2 NMDA receptor subunits in the dorsal horn of male and female rats

doi: 10.1080/19336950.2020.1871205

Figure Lengend Snippet: List of antibodies used for immunohistochemistry

Article Snippet: Rabbit anti-GluN2D , 1:1000 , Alomone Labs , ACG-020.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry

Figure 1. Clinical features and immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding to conformational neuronal surface epitopes from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE). A. Clinical features of 35 patients with SLE, including 15 with active NPSLE at the time of sampling. 32/34 (94%) were on immunotherapies, including prednisolone (71%), hydroxychloroquine (41%), belimumab (6%) and rituximab (3%). ANA = anti-nuclear antibody. B. Live cell-based assays employing HEK293T cells with surface expressed N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) as NR1-NR2A or NR1-NR2B heteromers (nuclei highlighted with DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). First panel shows that a commercial antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the NR2A-subunit (red) binds to HEK293T cells which express NR1-NR2A heteromers. NMDAR-antibody encephalitis (NMDAR-Ab-E) patient serum IgGs (n=11) bind to the NR1-NR2A heteromers (second panel), and to NR1-NR2B heteromers / NR1 homomers (data not shown). NMDAR-antibody patient CSFs show similar binding (as Irani et al, 2010).10 Serum from healthy controls (n=36), plasma and CSFs from SLE patients (n=35 of each) show no binding. No binding was observed with the G11 antibody (data not shown, lower panel representative). Throughout, IgG binding was visualized with an anti-human 568-Alexaflour antibody (1:750 dilution, A-21090) C. Commercial antibodies against the extracellular domains of NR1 (Alomone, AGC-001), NR2A (Alomone,

Journal: Annals of neurology

Article Title: Absence of Neuronal Autoantibodies in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

doi: 10.1002/ana.25908

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Clinical features and immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding to conformational neuronal surface epitopes from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE). A. Clinical features of 35 patients with SLE, including 15 with active NPSLE at the time of sampling. 32/34 (94%) were on immunotherapies, including prednisolone (71%), hydroxychloroquine (41%), belimumab (6%) and rituximab (3%). ANA = anti-nuclear antibody. B. Live cell-based assays employing HEK293T cells with surface expressed N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) as NR1-NR2A or NR1-NR2B heteromers (nuclei highlighted with DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). First panel shows that a commercial antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the NR2A-subunit (red) binds to HEK293T cells which express NR1-NR2A heteromers. NMDAR-antibody encephalitis (NMDAR-Ab-E) patient serum IgGs (n=11) bind to the NR1-NR2A heteromers (second panel), and to NR1-NR2B heteromers / NR1 homomers (data not shown). NMDAR-antibody patient CSFs show similar binding (as Irani et al, 2010).10 Serum from healthy controls (n=36), plasma and CSFs from SLE patients (n=35 of each) show no binding. No binding was observed with the G11 antibody (data not shown, lower panel representative). Throughout, IgG binding was visualized with an anti-human 568-Alexaflour antibody (1:750 dilution, A-21090) C. Commercial antibodies against the extracellular domains of NR1 (Alomone, AGC-001), NR2A (Alomone,

Article Snippet: Throughout, IgG binding was visualized with an anti-human 568-Alexaflour antibody (1:750 dilution, A-21090) C. Commercial antibodies against the extracellular domains of NR1 (Alomone, AGC-001), NR2A (Alomone, AGC-002) and NR2B (kind gift from Prof Stephenson, London) subunits bound to the surface of live HEK293T cells co-transfected with EGFP plus NR1 and NR2B subunits.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Clinical Proteomics, Sampling